The United States is intently monitoring incidents of human rights violations in Tibet by the Chinese authorities. In an unique dialog with India Today TV, prime US official and newly appointed particular coordinator for Tibet points within the State Department, Assistant Secretary Robert Destro mentioned that the “cancer” of “labour camps” in China had unfold from Xinjiang to Tibet.
In the primary interview to an Indian media home after assuming cost, Secretary Destro mentioned, “The US, in a first and historic decision, invited the Head of the Tibetan government-in-exile Dr Lobsang Sangay to the state department.”
The invitation is being seen as Washington’s recognition of the Tibetan government-in-exile.
“We were very pleased to have Dr Sangay to visit here at the State Department and it reflects the fact that we take Tibet very seriously. We are in full agreement with His Holiness the Dalai Lama that there is a third way. We want to see the Chinese government more engaged with the CTA and the HH the Dalai Lama himself,” mentioned Robert Destro.
Speaking on US’s stand, Destro advocated the ‘third way’ as proposed by Dalai Lama, which is absolute “autonomy” for Tibet.
“Part of my job is to work on that (autonomy). I have committed to the Tibetan advocates, to the Tibetan diaspora that I will be spending a lot of my time on this topic. We can all hope and pray that this is how it will end up. The third way that His Holiness (the Dalai Lama) has suggested we think is a very good way,” Destro advised India Today TV.
He mentioned that China has been “difficult” to cope with on the problem of permitting autonomy to Tibet. “We will do our best to work closely with them (China) to see how far we can take this,” he asserted.
On the problem of studies of half one million Tibetans pushed into pressured labour in labour camps which have been established inside Tibet, he mentioned Washington has been disturbed by the studies.
Calling it a “cancer”, the official mentioned, “We have heard. There are more and more Tibetans being pushed into labour camps. We are trying to confirm or deny what’s going on but those are the reports.”
“They are very disturbing. They would be very consistent with the reports coming out of Xinjiang. In fact, the cancer of forced labour is spreading from Xinjiang into Tibet,” he added.
Washington DC has been taking many steps and sanctioning Beijing on numerous counts, together with on operating such ‘labour camps’.
“We have taken very strong action against forced labour wherever it takes place and we would be taking the same actions. If we find out that goods are being produced by forced labour, they can be excluded from coming into the country. We have imposed visa and other sanctions on Chinese officials,” mentioned Destro.
A draft decision was just lately launched within the US Senate titled “Condemning the Chinese Communist Party’s use of forced labour and other coercive measures to destroy religious freedom in Tibet” by Republican Senator Josh Hawley and cosponsored by 10 different Senators.
The invoice additionally known as on the US authorities to assist the Tibetan Policy and Support Act (TPSA) of 2002 and urged the worldwide group to face in opposition to “Party’s hegemonic agenda”.
On the problem of reincarnation which has been a matter of longstanding debate between Beijing and the Dalai Lama camp, US has clarified that the one one to resolve successor to the Dalai Lama is the spiritual chief himself.
“This is an issue of religious belief for and about the Tibetans. The United States has taken a strong position in favour of religious liberties and one of those key concerns is to allow religious organisations to choose their own leadership,” the highest US official reiterated DC’s stand.
In a veiled risk of great ramifications to any pressured choice on the Tibetan individuals, he mentioned, “We would object to any attempt by the Chinese Communist Party to interfere in the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama.”
While the Tibetan Policy and Support Act (HR 4331), probably the most complete coverage invoice on Tibet for the reason that Tibet Policy Act- 2002, has been handed by the House of Representatives, it’s but to be handed by the Senate and signed by the President.
It is unlikely to occur now for the reason that US will go to polls on November 3. But, to a query on actions taken by the State Department to additional the invoice, Destro mentioned, “We here at the State Department don’t take any position on pending legislation. That is a question we would have to leave to the White House. That is up to them. We will take any position when we are given clearance to do so. Right now, that is a decision for the Congress to make and we respect that separation of powers.”
The different vital situation has been issues of transparency and entry to Tibet. Washington has taken some stringent motion on lack of entry supplied by the CPC to Tibet.
On the fallout, if any, of the Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act of 2018 that President Trump signed into regulation regardless of Chinese protests, the Assistant Secretary mentioned, “We have taken a very strong position that all people should be allowed access to Tibet, that Americans should be allowed access to Tibet, that Tibetans should be freely allowed to go back and forth. We are in favour of access and that is what the law was all about.”
Finally, to a query on whether or not answer to the India-China border battle is to resolve the Tibet query, he mentioned that it was a “bilateral” situation however the US would lengthen any assist required to resolve the issues between New Delhi and Beijing.
He added, “That would be beyond my expertise. China and India have to work out their own problems. Obviously, both countries have an interest in that region. The United States is willing to work with both countries to see that it gets resolved.”
Dr Lobsang Sangay, President of the Central Tibetan Administration, had as soon as mentioned in an interview to India Today TV that India shares a border with Tibet and never straight with China. An autonomous Tibet would guarantee peace on the Line of Actual Control (LAC).